Appealing a flawed negative administrative decision

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the methods of appealing negative administrative decisions that are defective in Libyan and comparative law. The researcher used the inductive approach with the aim of analyzing the legal rules that can be relied upon in appealing negative administrative decisions.
The administrative decision is one of the legal acts issued by the administration of its unilateral and binding will, which achieves a legal effect when the administration discloses its will, and since this decision may be unfair to individuals and may have an impact on their lives, such as the decision to skip appointment, which harms the individual and his family, and which may be unjust. Fair and that the law was not created to spread justice among people.
The study concluded that an administrative decision is generated if the administration refrains from issuing an administrative decision that it should have issued in accordance with the regulations and laws. Also, a negative administrative decision is a legal assumption that is not represented by an external body, and it is difficult to submit to it in the process of issuing it in accordance with the rules stipulated by the regulator. In explicit decisions and in accordance with formal rules